At about 9.40 am, the Registrar of the
court and the only functionary of this particular temple of justice that was
visibly existing in the court, cleared his sub-judicial throat and made the
portentous statement:
“Gentlemen of the Bar. The court will
not be sitting. The judge is dealing with N.J.C returns. Please listen as I
call the cases for today and take dates.” The response from the Bar and
gallery included the following: hisses, sighs of resignation, sheer
indifference, fulminations, shock and bitterness. I personally felt
cheated, humiliated and ill-used, considering that I had vaulted all the way
from Isolo to the Mainland and shunned some early morning labours of love in a
bid to make the court in time. It had been four months since we last came to
the court and had high hopes that the trial of the matter would continue today.
Alas, worse was to come. When it was our
turn to take dates, I told the Registrar that there was no need to get new
dates since we had two more trial dates already fixed. But when I enquired
whether the court would sit on the next given date which was just two days away
(Friday 5th October) the Vice-regal replied with a poignant and
pregnant rebuke, “Am I the Judge?”
After a few minutes of waiting, I
decided to seek the answer from the honourable judge himself, who should be in
chambers, ostensibly very busy dealing with “NJC returns.” At the expense of
holding his court.
So with a few other lawyers in the
matter in tow, we made the short pilgrimage to the judge’s chambers. To see a
judge, you need to pass through his secretaries and other staff. However we
discovered to our chagrin that at 10.05a.m on this wonderful day, the office of
the judge’s staff was firmly locked. The great men and women were yet to come
to work.
We looked out for the judge, but the
judex was certainly far away from the court. In the light of the foregoing, I
beg to pose the following questions:
1.
Is it right or proper for “NJC returns” to supersede
court sittings for the judge or magistrate?
2.
Where is the judge expected to be on a work day,
when not sick or on an outside official engagement: home, office, church/mosque/shrine
or any other place?
3.
Should judges deal with NJC returns at home or in
the office?
4.
Why is it that the long period of vacation and the
two or three weeks of indeterminable nature after the end of vacation are not
enough for a judge to have dealt with NJC
returns?
5.
How fair is to lawyers, witnesses and litigants
alike to make them come to court from all directions of the wind only to learn
in the very court that the court will not sit, especially these days that most
counsel file their processes with their phone numbers and e-mail addresses
stated thereon?
Whether Lagos
judicial authorities like to hear it or not, there is a clear culture of
judicial impunity and inefficiency rampant in the system. For example only
about a quarter of the fifty-five or so judges can be counted upon to be
punctual in court or commence sittings within twenty minutes of an hour after
9.00a.m. Many others sit just when they like, if they sit at all.
At the dinner
rounding up the New Legal Year, I thought I heard the Chief Judge tell lawyers
present to feel free and enjoy the atmosphere they had the good luck of sharing
with judges because “as from Monday, they will be at work and making Orders.”
But what I
witnessed at the Justice Gbajabiamila court on Wednesday the 3rd
October 2012 was far from the picture of brisk industry, and bristling
efficiency “Aunty Ayo” painted of our judges. And, that’s a pity. An
unacceptable pity.
No comments:
Post a Comment